Google Talk
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Posts: 119,838
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 0
Post: #1
02-10-2018 05:42 PM

I actually do not believe that Google tries some way that is to differently manage their markets than in a typically competitive way. And I do not believe that Google is actually super-arms army s...

I actually do not conform in the majority of the prevailing theories on the conspiracy of Google. I do not believe either that Google provides preference to the Internet sites which announce in its program of AdWords, or which it goes away certain sites from the first pages to motivate them to announce.

I really do not believe that Google tries some way that's to differently control their markets than in a normally competing way. And I don't think that Google is actually super-arms military solution. Be taught more on an affiliated essay by visiting success. I really believe that Google has good intentions. But these goals continue to scare me. Finally, that I think of Google is natural risk, based on facts readily available, but this speculation on Google appears to be to-day the interest of several people.

It's not really a wonder: after-all, Google is merely the business more intrigante that has honoured our economy for ten years. I believe that Google has good intentions, but as good as they could be, the result of their success frightens me. The makers of Google have to be platonists If Plato always lived, it would probably benefit Google. Google is looking for perfect, even if this one is finally inaccessible. With the difference of the majority of the major companies which will make the titles of the financial magazines, Google isn't primarily justified by the money.

The determination of Google could be the Intellectual, overcoming the challenges of organized data. Google known as: The goal of Google will be to manage world information and to create it universally accessible and useful. And it is what it does. This company quantified a number of billion dollars, indisputably one of most effective in the world, has the target simple to organize world data.

Google may be the vastest system of catalogue of earth. Obviously, that doesn't want to say that Google does not have any motivation for your money - and it has undoubtedly some. The device with under that's Google will be the containing hydrocarbon one of its idealistic goals. Google can worry more issues, to create more ressouces and it achieves finally more as a result of this money. Though the money never stops the work gathering, planning and from making information available, with contrario of Microsoft.

Although the mission of Microsoft is to help individuals and the companies to reach their full capacities, this help isn't free. The essential commodities of Microsoft are created to be sold. It is the traditional type of the financial techniques. Compared with this standard style of business, that of Google is extremely idealistic. That might be because of the fact that Google was not designed to make-money, but instead in a reaction to the challenge that Sergey Brin and Larry Page set up by creating a successful se.

To include/understand the brand new developments of Google Schmidt: We work hard to keep this image to be uncontrollable. But makes some, our company is quite measured. And that belonged to our secrecy. Page: Generally speaking, we do not speak about our approach as it is strategic. I prefer to allow think that we're confused in the place of to create known with this rivals what we can do. -- Extract of an interview of Times Magazine Well, let be to me the first to ever congratulate the Servant guys on Google. Your target to seem unmanageable was achieved.

Over these last years, Google released many products which made variety the top of the professionals from the walls. A number of these launchings met the thin acceptance, or made a complete confusion (it's not what Google is cautious to do?). These products also appear to be rather independent: products which make it possible to individuals to organize their planning (Google Calendar), or to examine the statistics in their Internet sites (Google Analytics).

The concept which prevails is that Google releases the products like manner of improving the conscience of mark, to produce other channels with their AdWords plan, as well as for just introducing anything to-see if it obtains a broad acceptance (like Google SiteMaps). I found out about save on by browsing Google. However, if we look at these items in the light of their mission (to collect and organize world information), each product belongs to the overall mission of Google. Eventually, Google collects well information and in very good part.

Using this time only, Google can start its classification. Now Google seeks the info of the users, the latter demand even for that. The majority of the new products of Google store the data of the customers. If you use this system of tchat of Google, you can keep all your conversations in a history with probability of study. Google Finance stores data on your beloved stocks, on that you release a tracking.

GMail enables you to store until 3GB messages, you incentive hence unconsciously to not remove them (it's probably what Google wants?). This interesting ftp pipedrive site has many novel tips for why to see about this belief. Google Base was released under the strange description that it was the place where to issue and store your contents, any contents. Google Reader shops your records of flow RSS, and now Google Calendar is incorporated into GMail and other companies to provide you with the possibility of holding still more data because of Google.

Google doesn't launch new products to enhance the conscience of mark; it releases these new products to get more information and to learn how all of this information features together. This information can be related to a registered person, and can be taken by using the various products from Google (such integration of Google Calendar in GMail). As much as which point I really do want that Google knows? If we really live in the age of information, then Google might become the strongest thing of the world.

Although I didn't see any standard study on the subject, I do not think that whoever could be shocked by knowing that there is more the information saved at Google than at any other organization or multinational in most the human history. Even with all of this information, Google seeks always more. The question that we must be posed is only knowledge of which amount of data holds only one company. Let us be us opposed if Google Wallet became your own center of finance where you could handle your bills in the budget, pay your bills online, and get personalized financial reports/ratios (normally all available and built-in in Google Finance).

Is this it towards what we go with Google while knowing slightly too much about us? Each new item of Google can be used to him to gather more information. Although this goal to assemble, organize and make available this information for the whole world, can be a fairly simple goal, do not should not put to us o-n stop one moment: do we really want that Google achieves this mission?.

Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)